FRENCH WORD OF THE DAY: Bisbille

Bisbille: A quarrel or disagreement over a minor issue; a petty squabble.

As seen in: « Les commentaires de Justin Trudeau au sujet de «l’échec» du registre des armes d’épaule ont semé la bisbille au sein de la famille libérale et provoqué des railleries de la part du chef néo-démocrate, Thomas Mulcair, qui s’est moqué des «crisettes internes» des libéraux. »

(Translation: “Justin Trudeau’s comments about the failure of the long-gun registry created squabbles within the Liberal family and provoked pleasantries from New Democrat leader Thomas Mulcair, who mocked the Liberals’ internal crisis.”)

http://fr.canoe.ca/infos/quebeccanada/archives/2012/12/20121203-203237.html

About these ads

COMMENT OF THE DAY: If this guy could speak French, he wouldn’t be encouraging people to donate to the PQ…

From: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/06/15/ndp-taunted-tories-with-french-2015-chant-as-budget-vote-wrapped/

The NDP may have been chanting “Deux mille quinze! Deux mille quinze!” at the conclusion of the parliamentary amend-athon, but this true Canadian patriot is encouraging all “REAL Canadians” to look to next year instead.  And by REAL Canadians, I’m assuming he means people who don’t listen to Nickelback…

Here’s the thing, though.  Even if you were to Google Translate the PQ website, which isn’t available en anglais, you’ll eventually end up at an online donation form with le Directeur général des élections du Québec.  And while this form does allow you to choose English as your language of correspondence, it does not have an entry field for Province, probably because they don’t take donations from outside of Quebec.  And it took a bilingual federalist all of three minutes to demonstrate why this glorious plan isn’t going to work.  Guess you’re stuck with Commie Tommy till at least deux mille quinze, mon vieux

COMMENT OF THE DAY: The NDP sez “No bags for you” too?

From: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/08/ndp-edges-ahead-of-tories

The latest Nanos poll has the federal NDP moving ahead of the Conservatives—by a whopping 0.1 per cent.  Hardly anything to hang your hat on, if it wasn’t for the fact that it’s their first time leading in the polls.  On the other hand, a Toronto Sun poll on whether the NDP will win the election shows that 38 per cent of respondents feel “their incompetence will be their undoing” and 22 per cent say they’ll move to Germany if the NDP does win.  And let’s just say that parliament should take no lessons in civility from the ensuing discussion in the comments section.  Case in point:

I guess the threat of no plastic bags nationwide looms large over this commentor, though I’m not so sure about his analogy.  Thomas Mulcair may be a bit of a loudmouth, but he’s barely a ripple on the Rob Ford scale.  Not to mention that the last time I checked, there was nothing in his party’s platform about stopping the gravy train.  Lest we forget that this dysfunctional city council is led by a man who has absolutely nothing in common with the NDP…

COMMENT OF THE DAY: Thomas Mulcair–better than a cartoon character!

From: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/mulcair-rallies-ndp-declares-beginning-of-the-end-of-tory-rule/article2420261/

Today is the one-year anniversary of the Conservative majority government, an event that prompted opposition leader Thomas Mulcair to pull out all the stops, including a “video montage of his MPs challenging the government in the House of Commons.”  Hey, everybody loves montages, including this Looney Tune:

So, if Daffy Duck’s the PM in your world, what does that make Bugs?  Minister of Defense?

So, it seems that Thomas Mulcair has a thing for Ruth Ellen Brosseau, too…

Don’t get me wrong, I love Ruth Ellen Brosseau.  I really do.  Of all the NDP poteaux in the last election, she was by far the best-looking.  And by all accounts, she’s doing pretty well in Berthier-Maskinongé, a riding she couldn’t have found on a map before being elected its MP.  But in naming her deputy critic of agriculture in the NDP shadow cabinet, Thomas Mulcair is making a mistake.

I mean, let’s face it; Brosseau doesn’t exactly have an agricultural background.  Need I remind you that she was a campus bartender before being elected?  Okay, so as a deputy critic, she’s basically a backup to Malcolm Allen, the NDP’s lead critic in that department, but if Mulcair really wanted to give her a token post in his shadow cabinet, could he not have found something more suitable, like women’s issues and gender equality, where she’d be backing up Niki Ashton?  I know I’d suddenly take a stronger interest in that domain if it was being criticized by a Brosseau-Ashton tag team!

Granted, it’s not like there are a whole lotta household names in the NDP’s Quebec caucus.  I for one have never heard of half these new deputy critics.  But in giving arguably the least-qualified MP of all-time a portfolio that she knows absolutely nothing about, Mulcair is only extending the punchline of the longest-running joke in Parliament.

That said, I just might find myself taking a new interest in agriculture…

COMMENT OF THE DAY: Now there’s a PPV I’d pay to see!

From: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/04/04/tension-between-ndp-liberals-as-rae-calls-mulcair-a-mini-harper/

Between Justin Trudeau’s unlikely boxing victory over Senator Brazeau and Thomas Mulcair’s much more likely win in the NDP leadership race, people have been paying a lotta attention to the opposition parties lately–albeit not to Bob Rae, the leader of the Liberals until he they decide otherwise.  But ol’ Bob still has a few tricks up his sleeve, including comparing the new NDP leader to a pint-sized edition of our current PM.

“If there was any doubt in anyone’s mind in Canada, let me just say that the era of love and good feeling is clearly over inside the NDP. It’s a new regime,” he said.  “We’ve now moved to the world where anger apparently is better than love, arrogance is now better than humility and petulance is much stronger than respect.”

I think we can see where this is headed…

How soon before I can make a bet–for charity, of course–on Mulcair?  I think he’d be a slight favourite in my books…

Is this man the next prime minister of Canada? Not without a little help from his enemies…

 

Since there was a decided lack of Saturday afternoon sports aside from the NCAA Tournament, I ended up flipping over to the NDP leadership convention during TV timeouts while watching the Elite Eight.  Twas a marathon affair that required four ballots and took no less than 12 hours–due in part to delays caused by hackers attacking the online voting software–but they ended up nominating the guy that almost everybody thought would win, ex-deputy leader Thomas Mulcair.  L’homme fort d’Outremont, the only NDP MP in Quebec whose parliamentary experience preceded last May’s election, was a natural choice for chef, considering that his province holds almost 60 per cent of the NDP’s seats–and that they’ll likely be hard-pressed to keep all of them come 2015.  Believe it or not, but Quebec is about to flock back to the Bloc, according to the latest Leger Marketing survey.  Mind you, they still have plenty of time to change their minds (again)…

That said, holding off the sovereingtist party in its new power base didn’t seem to be the top priority from the glimpses and snippets I saw of interviews with various MPs and party members.  These guys truly believe that their new leader is the next prime minister of Canada.  And of course they would.  You’re not gonna find an unbiased analysis of the Canadian political landscape at an NDP convention.  But realistically, I’m not sure how they intend to win enough seats across the country in three years’ time, unless they’re counting on the Conservatives contracting a serious case of political leprosy between now and the next campaign.  And hey, it could happen.  Stephen Harper was obviously lying through his teeth when he said he’d govern for all Canadians in his victory speech last year, and I’m not the only one who’s already a little leery of his strong, stable, national Conservative majority.  But where–and how–does he lose enough seats to cede power?  Perhaps it’s time to look back at the last right-wing déconfiture–the 1993 federal election.

Okay, so Mulcair and co might not wanna revisit a campaign that saw the NDP win only nine ridings–but that was still seven more than the Progressive Conservatives, who saw their seat count drop from 169 to a mere two.  And it wasn’t that everybody flocked to the Liberals, either, as they won a majority with just 41 per cent of the popular vote (gee, why does that number sound familiar?).  Rather, after nine years of majority PC rule, the political landscape looked a lot different with the rise of the Reform and the creation of the Bloc Quebecois.  Wait, does that mean he’s suggesting that we’ll need new political parties in order to unseat the Conservatives in 2015?  Why yes, I am!

Let’s face it, there aren’t too many Conservative-held ridings that’ll swing all the way to the NDP.  Stephen Harper’s power base is right-wing, rural Western Canada, where folks still haven’t forgiven Trudeau for the NEP and the new national opposition is a distant afterthought.  When I lived in Calgary, it wasn’t unusual for the NDP to run university students in Alberta ridings–but unlike the famous McGill four, they’d usually finish in fourth place (even behind the Green Party).  In fact, the only party that could take some of the 34 Alberta seats in the next election would be a new, Alberta-based right-wing party.  In fact, such a party already exists–albeit not on the federal level just yet.

The Wild Rose Party, which boasts the best campaign bus evar(!!!11!!), is seen as a serious challenger to the provincial PCs in this year’s provincial election.  Led by ex-Calgary Herald columnist Danielle Smith, the party espouses fiscally-conservative, libertarian views, in stark contrast to the current Canadian government’s jails and jets spending plan.  What would it take for the Wild Rose Party to take its act to the national stage?  Well, a win provincially would be a necessary first step, followed by a piece of federal legislation that so infuriates libertarians that they’d be tempted to throw their hat in the ring.  (Bill C-30 just might do the trick, though it’s a few years to soon.  What will Vic Toews come up with as an encore?)  Of course, a federal Wild Rose Party wouldn’t run across Canada, becoming a de facto Bloc Albertan, a single-province party acting as a thorn in the nationalists’ side.  But still, even if this hypothetical party were to sweep Alberta’s 34 seats, that wouldn’t be enough to sweep the Conservatives out of office.

So, where does the NDP win those extra seats?  They have some supporters in downtown Vancouver and Winnipeg, but Saskatchewan, the birthplace of its founder, Tommy Douglas, has been gerrymandered in such a way that there are no strictly urban ridings, with Regina and Saskatoon’s votes being mixed in with their surrounding rural areas.  The NDP can’t really take any more power away from the Bloc, so that leaves the 35 seats currently held by the Liberals.  And let’s face it, they can’t really count on the Liberals to collapse any further, so their best bet would be the old adage, “if you can’t beat ‘em, join em.”  Perhaps third-place candidate Nathan Cullen was on to something when he proposed a non-binding, one-off merger that would allow multiple parties to unite behind a single candidate in a particular riding.  It’s not quite the New Democratic Liberal Party, mind you, but if the two united, the Wild Rose took a big bite outta Alberta, and Quebec City swung back to the Bloc, expelling its last few Conservative candidates, we could very well see an NDP-led minority government in 2015.  Other than that, well, Harper would hafta do something so incredibly stupid that he’d be forced to pull a Mulroney and step down, leaving the party in shambles, and…

Okay, enough with the hypotheticals.  We’ve still got at least three years to go, in any case.

COMMENT OF THE DAY: Things stay the same for the NDP Maple Leafs…

From: http://ottawa.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20111013/mulcair-signals-candidacy-to-lead-federal-ndp-111013/20111013/?hub=OttawaHome

I hate to go back to the CTV well for the third straight day, but this one is just too good to pass up.  While Thomas Mulcair’s press conference announcing that he will take his best shot at becoming the new NDP head coach has inspired some crazy comments from the Sun section goons, including this truly bizarre hockey reference, I think that Prof. Pye Chartt’s analysis of the NDP leadership race provides a more accurate puck metaphor:

 

Did I mention that the Flames are in town this Saturday? ;)

 

UPDATE 4:15 PM: I always appreciate a witty remark, and here the CBC delivers—or at least a couple commentors on this CBC story do.  With all the Harper and Bush references in their user names, it’s clear that this is a partisan affair—but a solid exchange of one-liners, nevertheless.

 

 

 

What does EPW stand for, BTW?