If you give a million monkeys a computer, eventually one of them will log on to Wikipedia, steal a bunch of information about plants, and use it in a book. Perhaps that would be the best defense for noted primatologist Jane Goodall, who issued a semi-apology for her “well-researched book” that stole several unattributed passages straight from Wikipedia and other websites. According to the Washington Post, her transgressions “range from phrases to an entire paragraph from Web sites such as Wikipedia and others that focus on astrology, tobacco, beer, nature and organic tea.” Man, I hope there isn’t a passage about Coors Light being the World’s Most Refreshing Beer in there. Here’s hoping she didn’t use their website in her research…
Don’t get me wrong, when it comes to primates, Goodall is one of the foremost experts in the field. But by her own admission, she has never studied plants, which happen to be the topic of her new book Seeds of Hope: Wisdom and Wonder From the World of Plants. Thus, as the Post remarks, “It is when the book moves away from Goodall’s own stories to deliver background information on plants and their history that the instances of borrowing creep in.” In fact, when an expert botanist was invited to review the book by the D.C. based newspaper, he jumped all over the plagiarized passages and declined the assignment.
But this shocking revelation isn’t bad news for everybody. In fact, if you contributed to the Wikipedia page on 18th-century botanist John Bartram, you could probably demand royalties from Goodall’s publisher, as she reportedly lifted a sentence from the site. Said publisher, Grand Central, says it plans on “crediting the sources in subsequent releases,” but in the meantime, you could surely find a lawyer who would take your case—if you can prove you’re the one who wrote it in the first place.